Detecting facial similarity based on human perception of facial similarity

ABSTRACT

Similar faces may be determined within images based on human perception of facial similarity. The user may provide an image including a query face to which the user wishes to find faces that are similar. Similar faces may be determined based on similarity information. Similarity information may be generated from information related to a human perception of facial similarity. Images that include faces determined to be similar, based on the similarity information, may be provided to the user as search result images. The user then may provide feedback to indicate the user&#39;s perception of similarity between the query face and the search result images.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is related to U.S. application Ser. No. ______,Attorney Docket No. 06975-732001, filed on May 10, 2006 and titled UsingRelevance Feedback in Face Recognition, which is incorporated byreference in its entirety.

TECHNICAL FIELD

This description relates to determining similar faces within images.

BACKGROUND

Facial feature detection systems may search a database of imagesincluding faces for faces that are the same as a query face. Facialfeature detection systems of this type typically are used for lawenforcement and security applications.

SUMMARY

In one aspect, similar faces within images are determined based on auser's perception of facial similarity. Similarity information thatindicates human perception of facial similarity is determined. A queryimage that includes a query face is received. One or more search resultimages that include at least one face that is similar to the query faceare determined based on the similarity information that indicates thehuman perception of facial similarity. The search result images areprovided to a user.

Implementations may include one or more of the following features. Forexample, a mapping function may be determined between an objectivefeature space and a psychological feature space. One or more searchresult images that include at least one face that is similar to thequery face may be determined based on the mapping function.

A query feature vector may be generated in the objective feature spacebased on the query face. The query feature vector may be mapped from theobjective feature space into the psychological feature space using themapping function. A set of search feature vectors in the psychologicalfeature space that are associated with a set of search faces may beaccessed. Distances between the mapped query feature vector and thesearch feature vectors may be determined. One or more search featurevectors that are within a selected distance of the mapped query vectormay be selected. Images that include the search faces associated withthe selected search feature vectors may be designated as the one or moresearch result images.

A set of search feature vectors in the objective feature space that areassociated with a set of search faces may be accessed. The searchfeature vectors may be mapped from the objective feature space into thepsychological feature space to form the set of search feature vectors inthe psychological feature space that are associated with a set of searchfaces.

A class for the query face may be detected. A collection of featurevectors in the psychological feature space that are associated with acollection of faces may be accessed. Faces in the collection of facesthat are the same class as the query face may be determined. The set ofsearch feature vectors may be formed by selecting the feature vectors inthe collection of feature vectors that correspond to the faces in thecollection of faces that are the same class as the query face.

The distances may be weighted Euclidean distances, such that weightedEuclidean distances between the mapped query feature vector and thesearch feature vectors may be determined.

A query feature vector may be generated in the objective feature spacebased on the query face. A set of search feature vectors in theobjective feature space that are associated with a set of search facesmay be accessed. Distances between the query feature vector and thesearch feature vectors may be determined. The distances may be mappedinto the psychological feature space. One or more search feature vectorsthat are within a selected distance of the query vector may be selectedbased on the mapped distances. Images that include the search facesassociated with the selected search feature vectors may be designated asthe one or more search result images.

A class for the query face may be detected. A collection of featurevectors in the objective feature space that arc associated with acollection of faces may be accessed. Faces in the collection of facesthat are the same class as the query face may be determined. The set ofsearch feature vectors may be formed by selecting the feature vectors inthe collection of feature vectors that correspond to the faces in thecollection of faces that are the same class as the query face.

The distances may be weighted Euclidean distances, such that weightedEuclidean distances between the query feature vector and the searchfeature vectors may be determined.

Inequalities between training faces may be determined. Inequalities mayrepresent a similarity of two training faces with respect to two othertraining faces. A mapping function between an objective feature spaceand a psychological feature space may be determined based on theinequalities.

Training feature vectors in the objective feature space may bedetermined based on the training faces. The training feature vectors maybe separated by objective distances. A function over a matrix M thatminimizes differences between the objective distances and theinequalities may be optimized.

The search result images may be provided to the user in a datingapplication or in a social networking application.

Implementations of any of the techniques described may include a methodor process, an apparatus or system, or computer software on acomputer-useable medium. The details of particular implementations areset forth below. Other features will be apparent from the descriptionand drawings, and from the claims.

DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing an example of a communications systemconfigured to provide images having faces similar to a query face basedon human perception of facial similarity.

FIGS. 2-8 are flow charts illustrating examples of processes fordetermining similar faces within images based on human perception offacial similarity.

FIG. 9 is an example of a UI 900 configured to allow a user to provide aquery face to initiate a search for faces that are similar to the queryface in an online dating service application.

FIG. 10 is an example of a UI 1000 showing search result images andbeing configured for a user to initiate a second search for similarfaces by providing a second query face.

FIGS. 11 and 12 are examples of UIs 1100 and 1200 configured to allow auser to provide user feedback about the search result images.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The following discussion describes techniques to find faces, among a setof faces, that are perceptually similar to a query face. In other words,techniques are described to find faces that are similar in a subjectiveor psychological sense, but which may or may not be exact matches for aface in a query image.

Such techniques may be useful in a number of applications. For example,a user of an online dating service may wish to find people who look likea particular person, such as a celebrity, for example, or, moregenerally, to find people who look similar to someone the user findsattractive. As a particular example of the techniques applied to anonline dating site, a user may find Nicole Kidman attractive, and wishto locate users of the online dating site that look similar to NicoleKidman. In this case, the user can submit a picture of Nicole Kidman tothe system and indicate that the system should “find me people who looklike this,” i.e., return faces that are perceptually similar to that ofNicole Kidman in a subjective or psychological sense. The system thensearches the faces of users of the online dating site and determinesusers who have faces that are perceptually similar to Nicole Kidman.

As another example of the techniques applied to an online datingservice, a person may search through a database of images on the onlinedating service and find an image of someone whom the user findsattractive. The user may then instruct the system to further refinetheir search to “find me people who look like this.” The system then maysearch and locate users with faces that look similar to the face chosenby the user.

The techniques may be applied in other applications, such as, forexample, applications available to people who belong to an interactservice (such as America Online® (AOL®)) or a social networking service(such as myspace.com) that allow the posting of digital photos. Forexample, using such a service, a user may be interested in finding otherusers of the service who look like the user. In another example, a usermay wish to find other users of the service who look like a particularperson, such as a celebrity. Furthermore if the service has a databaseof celebrity images, the user may wish to determine which celebrity theuser most resembles.

Objective criteria about faces may be used to assess similarity betweenfaces. However, it may not be enough that two faces are objectivelysimilar, such as, for example, having the same hair color or the sameeye shape. When determining that a face is similar to a query face, moreaccurate results may be obtained by taking into account human subjectiveperception of similarity. The following discussion also describestechniques that may produce more accurate results by using a particularuser's perception of facial similarity to determine perceptually similarfaces.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing an example of a communications system100 that includes a client 110 connected to a host 130 through a network120. In general, the host 130 is configured to receive a query face fromthe client 110, search images to locate perceptually similar faces basedon human perception of facial similarity, and, at least in someimplementations, send the images having similar faces to the client 110for display.

Each of the client 110 and the host 130 may be implemented by, forexample, a general-purpose computer capable of responding to andexecuting instructions in a defined manner, a personal computer, aspecial-purpose computer, a workstation, a server, a device, acomponent, other equipment or some combination thereof capable ofresponding to and executing instructions. The client 110 and host 130may be configured to receive instructions from, for example, a softwareapplication, a program, a piece of code, a device, a computer, acomputer system, or a combination thereof, which independently orcollectively direct operations, as described herein. The instructionsmay be embodied permanently or temporarily in any type of machine,component, equipment, storage medium, or propagated signal that iscapable of being delivered to the client 110 or the host 130.

The network 120 includes hardware and/or software capable of enablingdirect or indirect communications between the client 110 and the host130. As such, the network 120 may include a direct link between theclient 110 and the host 130, or it may include one or more networks orsub networks between them (not shown). Each network or sub network mayinclude, for example, a wired or wireless data pathway capable ofcarrying and receiving data. Examples of the delivery network includethe Internet, the World Wide Web, a WAN (“Wide Area Network”), a LAN(“Local Area Network”), analog or digital wired and wireless telephonenetworks, radio, television, cable, satellite, and/or any other deliverymechanism for carrying data.

In one implementation, the client 110 includes one or more clientapplications (e.g., a web browser, a mail application, an instantmessaging client, an Internet service provider client, a media player,or another client application) capable of receiving one or more dataunits. The client applications may run on a general-purpose operatingsystem and a hardware platform that includes a general-purpose processorand specialized hardware for graphics, communications and/or othercapabilities. In another implementation, the client 110 may include awireless telephone, or personal digital assistant (PDA), running amicro-browser application on an embedded operating system with generalpurpose and specialized hardware capable of operating in mobileenvironments.

In general, the client 110 presents one or more user interfaces (UIs)that enable a user to search for faces that are perceptually similar toa query face. The UIs may be rendered on client 110, for example, aspart of a so-called thick client application, or may be rendered by aso-called thin client application, such as a web browser. For instance,the UIs may be one or more web pages rendered by a web browser. In someimplementations, the UIs may relate to an online dating service.

More particularly, client 110 may be configured to receive informationrelated to human perception of facial similarity and transmit thisinformation to host 130. Client 110 also may present one or more UIsthat allow a user to select a query face and provide the query face tohost 130. The user may enter a query face by using the UI to upload animage that includes the query face or to select an image that resides onthe Internet or another network and that includes the query face. Forexample, the UI may allow the user to select an image stored in anonline database, in an online photograph album or on a website.

Client 110 may be configured to receive from host 130 search resultimages that include faces that are perceptually similar to the queryface. Client 110 also may be configured to present the search resultimages to the user by displaying the search result images in a UI.

The host 130 generally includes one or more devices configured toreceive a query face and return search result images that include facesdetermined to be similar to the query face. Host 130 also may beconfigured to generate and store similarity information that indicateshuman perception of facial similarity. The similarity information may beused to determine faces that are similar to the query face. Host 130 maybe configured to provide to client 110 images that include faces similarto the query face as search result images.

FIG. 2 is a flow chart illustrating an example of a general process 200for determining similar faces within images based on human perception offacial similarity. Generally, the operations of process 200 may be usedin conjunction with the systems and configurations described earlier inFIG. 1. For example, process 200 may be performed by host 130. Forconvenience, host 130 of FIG. 1 is referenced as performing the process.However, similar methodologies may be applied in other implementationswhere different components are used to define the structure of thesystem, or where the functionality is distributed differently among thecomponents shown.

Initially, the host 130 determines similarity information that indicateshuman perception of facial similarity (202). To that end, the host 130may obtain information related to human perception of facial similarityfrom one or more training users during a training stage. For example, atraining user may be asked to react to a series of training imagespresented to the training user. A particular implementation of a processfor determining similarity information is described below with respectto FIG. 3.

Next, the host 130 receives a query image that includes a query face(204). In some implementations, a user may provide a query image thatincludes a query face through a UI presented by client 110. The queryimage may reside on a user's personal computer or other device, such as,for example, a PDA or cell phone. In this example, the user may uploadthe image using the UI. In another example, the query image may alreadyreside on the Internet, such as, for example, in a virtual hard drive, adigital photograph album or on a website. Additionally, oralternatively, the user may provide the query image by another method,such as, for example, sending the query image attached to an e-mailmessage or short message service (SMS) text message, or as part of amultimedia messaging service (MMS) message.

Upon receiving the query image, the host 130 accesses the similarityinformation determined in operation 202 (206) and determines one or moresearch result images that include at least one face that is similar tothe query face based on the similarity information (208). To that end,the host searches a set of search images that include search faces tofind those images that contain faces perceptually similar to the query.The host 130 may search all, or a subset of, the search images.Particular implementations of a process for determining search resultimages are described below with respect to FIGS. 5 and 6.

Once the search result images are determined, the host 130 provides thesearch result images to the user (210). For example, the host 130 maytransmit a web page that includes the search result images to the client110, or the host 130 may transmit the images directly to the client 110.The client 110 then may present the images to the user.

Once host 130 has provided the search result images to the user, host130 may optionally receive user feedback from the user based on whetherthe user actually finds the search result images to include faces thatare perceptually similar to the query face (212). The user feedback maybe used by host 130 to provide different search result images for thequery face (212). Typically, the different search result images areprovided to the user immediately, but this need not be so.

In general, FIGS. 3-8 illustrate particular examples of processes thatmay be used to implement aspects of the process 200. In these examples,faces are represented by feature vectors. A feature vector is a seriesof values, where each value represents information about a particularfeature of the face. The features may relate to shapes (referred to asgeometry) or appearance (referred to as photometry) of individual facialfeatures, or the entire face, such as, for example, eye color, nosewidth, distance between the eyes, skin tone, or other functions of thepixel intensities of the face. For example, features may have a valuederived from a set of pixel intensities associated with a particularlocation on a face. The features also may include non-face basedfeatures, such as clothing patterns and colors, background shapes andbody proportions.

There a number of techniques for obtaining feature vectors from a face.For example, one common approach is to transform a set of training faceimages into a small set of characteristic feature images, known aseigenfaces, where these eigenfaces are the principal components of thistraining set of face images, and then to represent new face images as afunction of these eigenfaces. This technique is described in Turk,Matthew A. and Alex P. Pentland, “Face Recognition Using Eigenfaces,”Vision and Modeling Group, The Media Laboratory, Massachusetts Instituteof Technology, 1991. Furthermore, techniques for obtaining featurevectors are also described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. ______,Attorney Docket No. 06975-732001, filed May 10, 2006 and titled UsingRelevance Feedback in Face Recognition. These techniques also may beused to obtain the various feature vectors described with respect toFIGS. 3-8.

Furthermore, in these examples, similarity between two faces isgenerally based on a distance between the respective feature vectorsrepresenting the faces. Faces may be designated as similar to the queryface when their respective feature vectors are within a pre-selecteddistance of the query face feature vector. In some implementations, thedegree of similarity may be indicated by the value of the distance, withcloser vectors indicating more similar faces than vectors that arefarther away. In addition, to take human perception of facial similarityinto account, the examples below obtain information from human trainingusers about their perception of facial similarity and use thisinformation to determine a mapping function that maps between anobjective feature space and a psychological feature space. The mappingfunction is applied to the feature vectors and then the distances arecalculated to determine similar faces, or the distance between thefeature vectors is calculated and the mapping function is applied to thedetermined distances.

FIG. 3 is a flow chart that represents a particular implementation ofoperation 202 of FIG. 2. Process 202 also may be performed by host 130of FIG. 1.

In the implementation shown in FIG. 3, the similarity information isdetermined based on a set of inequalities that represent the relativesimilarity between training faces in a set of training images. Theinequalities are generally determined by showing the images to one ormore training users and requesting the training users to indicate whichfaces are more similar. To begin process 202, host 130 accesses a set oftraining images and displays them to a training user (300).

Host 130 then requests that the training user select the two mostsimilar faces (it is assumed for this discussion that there is one faceper training image) in the set of images, which are referred to as imagei and image j (and which form a connected set C) (302). Based on theuser's selection, host 130 establishes a set of inequalities between thesimilarity of image i and image j and the similarity of image i or imagej to each of the remaining images (images k, where k=1, 2, . . . N, k≠i,j) in the set of images (304). An inequality indicates that two imagesare closer (or more similar) than two other images. For example, face xmay be more similar to face y than to face z and face y may be moresimilar to face x than to face z. In this example, the inequality mayindicate that the similarity (S) of face x to face y is greater than thesimilarity (S) of face x to face z, or S_(xy)>S_(xz), and the similarity(S) of face x to face y is greater than the similarity of face y to facez, or S_(xy)>S_(yz).

The inequalities established indicate that image i and image j arecloser than image i and image k or image j and image k, where image krepresents the other images in the set of images. Thus,

S _(ij) >S _(ik), where k=1,2, . . . N, where k≠j, and

S _(ij) >S _(jk), where k=1,2, . . . N, where k≠j.

Host 130 requests that the user select the next two closest images,referred to as image m and image n from the set of images (306). Host130 then determines if one of image m or image n is in connected set C(308). For example, if face x (image i) and face y (image j) are thefirst two closest faces, and face x (image m) and face z (image n) arethe next two closest images, face x is already present in connected setC because face x is both image i and image m.

If so, host 130 establishes a set of inequalities between the similarityof image m and image n and the similarity of image m or image n to atleast some of the remaining images (images k, where k=1, 2, . . . N,k≠m, n) where appropriate (310A). For example, if image m is inconnected set C (e.g., image m is the same as image i or image j), host130 establishes the following inequalities:

S _(mn) >S _(mk), where k≠n, and k is not in connected set C, and

S _(mn) >S _(nk), where k≠m.

Alternatively, if image n is in connected set C (e.g., image n is thesame as image i or image j), host 130 establishes the followinginequalities:

S _(mn) >S _(mk), where k≠n, and

S _(mn) >S _(nk), where k≠m, and k is not in connected set C.

If neither image m nor image n are in connected set C, image m and imagen form a connected set D and host 130 establishes the following set ofinequalities (310B):

S _(mn) >S _(mk), where k≠n, and

S _(mn) >S _(nk), where k≠m.

Host 130 requests that the training user select the next two closestimages from the set of images, which are referred to as image p andimage q (312). Host 130 determines if one of image p or image q is inany already created connected set, such as connected set C or connectedset D (314). For example, if face x (image m) and face y (image n) arethe second two closest faces, and face x (image p) and face z (image q)are the next two closest images, face x is already present in connectedset D because face x is both image m and image p.

If so, host 130 establishes a set of inequalities between the similarityof image p and image q and the similarity of image p or image q to atleast some of the remaining images (images k, where k=1, 1, . . . N,k≠p, q) where appropriate (316A). For example, if image p is inconnected set D (e.g., image p is the same as image m or image n), host130 establishes the following inequalities:

S _(pq) >S _(pk), where k≠q, and k is not in connected set D, and

S _(pq) >S _(qk), where k≠p.

Alternatively, if image q is in connected set D (e.g., image q is thesame as image m or image n), host 130 establishes the followinginequalities:

S _(pq) >S _(pk), where k≠q, and

S _(pq) >S _(qk), where k≠p, and k is not in connected set D.

Similarly, if image p is in connected set C (e.g., image p is the sameas image i or image j), host 130 establishes the following inequalities:

S _(pq) >S _(pk), where k≠q, and k is not in connected set C, and

S _(pq) >S _(qk), where k≠p.

Alternatively, if image q is in connected set C (e.g., image q is thesame as image i or image j), host 130 establishes the followinginequalities:

S _(pq) >S _(pk), where k≠q, and

S _(pq) >S _(qk), where k≠p, and k is not in connected set C.

If neither image p nor image q are in connected set C or connected setD, image p and image q form a new connected set (e.g., connected set B)and host 130 establishes the following set of inequalities (316B):

S _(pq) >S _(pk), where k≠q, and

S _(pq) >S _(qk), where k≠p.

The operations of FIG. 3 represent an example where a limited number offaces or images are in the set of training images, thus limiting thenumber of inequalities that may be established, or an example where lessthan all possible inequalities are purposefully established. In someimplementations, the operations described may determine a sufficientnumber of inequalities. However, in some implementations, if more facesor images exist in the set of training images, or it is desirable toestablish a larger number of inequalities, additional operations similarto those described with respect to FIG. 3 may be performed by host 130.For example, the next two closest images (perhaps referred to as image sand image t) may be determined, host 130 may determine if either image sor image t is in an already-created connected set, and depending on thedetermination, a number of inequalities may be established in the mannerdescribed above. The same may be true for the further next two closestimages, and so on.

Host 130 may repeat such operations in the manner described. Theoperations may be repeated either until no more inequalities can beobtained or until a desired number of inequalities, perhaps less thanall possible inequalities, have been obtained.

In some implementations, instead of simply determining inequalitiesbetween images in the connected sets, host 130 may determine actualdistances between the images in the set of images. For example, ratherthan determining that face x is more similar to face y than to face z,and thus face x may be conceptually closer to face y than to face z in aconnected set, host 130 may calculate a distance of I between face x andface y, but a distance of 3 between face x and face z.

Operations 300-316B illustrate one implementation for determininginequalities between training images. However, other approaches also maybe used. For example, the training users may be presented with threeimages and asked to indicate which two images of the trilogy includefaces that are most similar, the training users may be presented withevery image in the training set and asked to compare every face in eachimage with every other face in the image set (by, for example, assigningnumbers indicating how similar (or dissimilar) the faces are to oneanother), or two training users may be asked to compare two pairs ofrandomly selected images having faces to determine which faces are moresimilar.

Reactions to the training images may be obtained from more than onetraining user, and host 130 may combine the reaction data received fromthe training users. For example, a voting system may be used such thatif two out of three training users indicated that face x and face y aremore similar to one another than face x and face z, thereby creating theinequality S_(xy)>S_(xz), then values associated with the inequality(e.g., distortions) may be weighted by a value. The value may be afraction that represents a number of training users who indicated face xand face y were more similar divided by a total number of training userswho have judged the set of faces. In the present example, the fractionmay be ⅔. The weight determined may be applied as described in detailbelow.

In another example, a majority rules system may be used. Again, if twoout of three training users indicated that face x and face y are moresimilar to one another than face x and face z, creating the inequalityS_(xy)>S_(xz), the majority may rule. In this system, informationrelated to similarity among faces indicated by a majority of thetraining users may be used, while information related to similarityamong faces indicated by a minority of the training users may bediscarded. In the present example, the inequality S_(xy)>S_(xz), asdetermined by a majority of the training users, may be used by host 130to represent the relative similarity between faces x, y and z, while thealternate inequality S_(xz)>S_(xy), as determined by a minority oftraining users, may be discarded and not used by host 130 to representthe relative similarity between faces x, y and z.

In yet another example, the reaction data may be averaged. Thisimplementation may require that a determination of similarity betweentwo faces is based on a distance determined between feature vectorsrepresenting the two faces. An indication of similarity between twofaces provided by the training user may be translated into a distancebetween the two faces and represented as a number. Thus, if more thanone training user indicates similarity between the same two faces, morethan one distance between the two faces may be determined. Thedetermined distances may be averaged by host 130 to form a single value,or distance, between the two faces that represents the indication ofsimilarity provided by the more than one training users. The singlevalue then may be used by host 130 to represent the relative similaritybetween two or more faces.

The voting system, majority rules system and averaging are examples oftechniques to combine reactions of more than one training user to thetraining images. However, other methods also may be used to combine thereaction data received from multiple training users.

Once the inequalities (single or combined) are determined, host 130determines a mapping function between an objective feature space and apsychological feature space based on the inequalities (or actualdistances, if determined) (318). In general, the mapping function mapsobjective feature vectors (those originally formed from the actualfacial features), which are represented in an objective feature space,into psychological feature vectors that are represented in apsychological feature space. The mapping function alternatively may mapdistances between objective feature vectors into a psychological featurespace. The mapping function also may take into account any weightsdetermined based on reactions to the training images having beenobtained from more than one training user.

The objective feature space represents an objective degree of similaritybetween two faces. The psychological feature space represents asubjective degree of similarity between two faces. The subjective degreeof similarity is based on human perception of facial similarity. Forexample, two faces may both include brown hair, blue eyes, small ears,and a pointy chin. However, the two faces may have drastically differentshaped noses. In this way, the two faces may be objectively similar.However, human perception of facial similarity may indicate that hairand eye color are less important to a finding of similarity thansimilarly shaped noses. Thus, a human, e.g., a training user, may findthat the two faces in the present example are not similar. The humanperception of facial similarity (e.g., high importance of nose shape andlow importance of hair and eye color) may be taken into account by themapping function based on the reactions to training images by thetraining users during the training phase.

FIG. 4 is a flow chart that represents a particular implementation ofoperation 318 of FIG. 3. Process 318 also may be performed by host 130of FIG. 1.

The host 130 determines training feature vectors in the objectivefeature space for training faces in the training images (402). In otherwords, the host 130 determines feature vectors that are related to theobjective features of the faces and not related (at least not yet) tohuman perception of facial similarity. The feature vectors determined byhost 130 in this operation may be referred to as training featurevectors because the feature vectors may be used to create a mappingbetween the objective feature space and the psychological feature space.In general, the distance between the feature vectors in the objectivefeature space represents the amount of objective similarity betweenfaces in the training images.

In some implementations, host 130 may dynamically generate a featurevector for a face when a request for similar faces is received.Additionally, or alternatively, host 130 may generate a feature vectorfor a face before the request is received and the feature vectors maythen be stored. For example, host 130 may generate a feature vector whenthe face is added to an image database, such that the database may storethe images and feature vectors associated with the faces in the images.In this configuration, host 130 need only access, rather than generate,the training feature vector for the faces in the training images duringthis operation.

The host 130 also accesses the inequalities that represent the humanperception of similarity between the faces in the training images (404).In other implementations, instead of simple inequalities, the distancesbetween training faces in the trainings images may be used if thedistances are determined.

Given the objective feature vectors and the inequalities, host 130optimizes a function over a matrix M (referred to as a similaritymatrix) that maximizes the correlation between the inequalities and thedistances between feature vectors in the objective feature space (406).For example, the host 130 may determine the value of M that minimizesthe following function:

$\mspace{79mu} {D = {\frac{- 1}{N}{\sum\limits_{{faces}\mspace{14mu} k}^{N}\; \frac{{\text{?}{Dist}{\langle{{M\; x_{k}},{M\; x_{j}}}\rangle}} - {{Dist}{\langle{{M\; x_{k}},{M\; x_{i}}}\rangle}}}{\text{?}{{{{Dist}{\langle{{M\; x_{k}},{M\; x_{j}}}\rangle}} - {{Dist}{\langle{{M\; x_{k}},{M\; x_{i}}}\rangle}}}}}}}}\;$?indicates text missing or illegible when filed

where x represents the feature vectors, S_(ki) represents the similaritybetween faces k and i, S_(ki)>S_(kj) indicates that face k and face iare more similar to one another than face k and face j, and Dist<MX_(k),Mx_(j)> indicates the distortion (or distance) between the featurevector associated with face k and the feature vector associated withface j after the feature vectors have each been mapped to thepsychological space using matrix M.

Similarity matrix M also may take into account any weights determinedbased on reactions to the training images having been obtained from morethan one training user. The weight (W) related to an indication thatmore training users thought faces k and i were more similar than faces kand j may be applied to the function as follows.

$\mspace{79mu} {D = {\frac{- 1}{N}{\sum\limits_{{faces}\mspace{14mu} k}^{N}\; \frac{\text{?}\text{?}\left( {{{Dist}{\langle{{Mx}_{k},{M\; x_{j}}}\rangle}} - {{Dist}{\langle{{M\; x_{k}},{M\; x_{i}}}\rangle}}} \right)}{\text{?}\text{?}{{{{Dist}{\langle{{M\; x_{k}},{M\; x_{j}}}\rangle}} - {{Dist}{\langle{{M\; x_{k}},{M\; x_{i}}}\rangle}}}}}}}}\;$?indicates text missing or illegible when filed

where Ws_(ki)>s_(kj), for example, is a fraction that represents thenumber of training users who indicated that face k and face i were moresimilar than face k and face j divided by the number of total trainingusers who rated the three faces k, i and j.

In this case, the similarity matrix M maps objective feature vectorsinto the psychological space. As an alternative, the host 130 maydetermine a similarity matrix M that maps the distances betweenobjective feature vectors into the psychological space. For example, thehost 130 may determine the value of M that minimizes the followingfunction:

$\mspace{79mu} {D = {\frac{- 1}{N}{\sum\limits_{{faces}\mspace{14mu} k}^{N}\; \frac{\text{?}{M\left\lbrack {D_{kj} - D_{ki}} \right\rbrack}}{\text{?}{{M\left\lbrack {D_{kj} - D_{ki}} \right\rbrack}}}}}}$?indicates text missing or illegible when filed

where D_(kj) represents a matrix of Dist<X_(k)−x_(j)>, such that eachelement in D_(kj) is the distance between corresponding elements ofx_(k) and x_(j) and thus D_(kj) _(—) _(lm)=Dist<x_(k) _(—) _(lm), x_(j)_(—) _(lm)> and M[D_(kj)−D_(ki)] indicates a matrix multiply betweenmatrix M and the matrix [D_(kj)−D_(ki)].

These functions may be optimized over M using numerical optimizationmethods.

For example, the conjugate gradient method may be employed. This methodis described, for example, in Press et al., “Numerical Recipes in C: Theart of scientific computing,” Cambridge University Press.

The distance between feature vectors (either objective feature vectorsor mapped feature vectors) may be measured by a variety of metrics. Forexample, a Euclidean distance may be used. In general, the Euclideandistance between two feature vectors may be determined by using theformula

D=√{square root over ((A ₁ −B ₁)²+(A ₂ −B ₂)²+ . . . +(A _(n) −B_(n))²)}{square root over ((A ₁ −B ₁)²+(A ₂ −B ₂)²+ . . . +(A _(n) −B_(n))²)}{square root over ((A ₁ −B ₁)²+(A ₂ −B ₂)²+ . . . +(A _(n) −B_(n))²)}

where the two feature vectors are feature vector A and feature vector B,with each having n features, such that the features of each featurevector may be designated with the vector name (e.g., A) and a subscriptindicating which feature number is being referenced (e.g., A₁ refers tothe first feature in feature vector A).

FIG. 5 is a flow chart for a process 208 a that represents a particularimplementation of operation 208 of FIG. 2. This particularimplementation uses a mapping function (e.g., a similarity matrix M)that maps objective feature vectors into psychological feature vectors.Process 208 a also may be performed by host 130 of FIG. 1.

Host 130 generates a query feature vector based on a query face (502).The query feature vector includes a series of values, where each valuecorresponds to a particular feature of the query face.

Host 130 maps the query feature vector into psychological feature spaceusing a mapping function (504). For example, a similarity matrix M thatmaps objective feature vectors into psychological feature vectors may beused by multiplying the similarity matrix M by the query feature vector.In other words, if q represents the query feature vector in theobjective feature space and p_(q) represents the query feature vector inpsychological feature space, then p_(q) may be calculated by

p _(q) =Mq

Host 130 also accesses a set of search feature vectors associated withsearch faces (506). Search faces are the faces that are potentiallysimilar to the query face. As with the training feature vectors, thesearch feature vectors may be generated dynamically when a request isreceived, or may be generated and stored beforehand with the host 130accessing the search feature vectors during this operation.

Host 130 then maps the search feature vectors into psychological spaceusing a mapping function (508). For example, a similarity matrix M thatmaps objective feature vectors into psychological feature vectors may beused by multiplying the similarity matrix M by each feature vector. Inother words, where x represents a search feature vector in objectivefeature space and p_(x) represents the corresponding psychologicalfeature vector, the psychological feature vector p_(x) may be calculatedby

p _(x) =Mx

Once the host 130 determines the mapped query feature vector and themapped search feature vectors, the host 130 determines the distancebetween the mapped query feature vector and the mapped search featurevectors (510). The host 130 may determine the distance between the queryfeature vector and the search feature vectors using the Euclideandistance described above.

After determining the distances between the mapped query feature vectorand the mapped search feature vectors, the host 130 selects the N mappedsearch feature vectors that are closest to the mapped query featurevector (512). N is the number of faces that are determined to be similarto the query face due to the proximity of the search face to the queryface in the psychological space. The value of N may be a pre-set value,or may be dynamically determined during the search.

Lastly, the host 130 designates the images that contain the facescorresponding to the N selected search feature vectors as the searchresult images (514). In doing so, the host 130 may rank the similarityof the N faces to the query face based on the distances of theircorresponding mapped search feature vectors to the mapped query searchfeature vector.

FIG. 6 is a flow chart for a process 208 b that represents a particularimplementation of operation 208 of FIG. 2. This implementation uses amapping function that maps distances between objective feature vectorsinto a psychological feature space. Process 208 b also may be performedby host 130 of FIG. 1.

Host 130 generates a query feature vector in the objective feature spacebased an the query face (602) and accesses a set of search featurevectors (represented in the objective feature space) that are associatedwith search faces (604).

Host 130 determines a distance (e.g., a Euclidean distance) between thequery feature vector and the search feature vectors (606). In thisconfiguration, host 130 determines the distance between the queryfeature vector and a search feature vector while the two feature vectorsremain in the objective space (that is, instead of mapping the featurevectors and then determining the distance between mapped vectors, asdiscussed above with respect to FIG. 5). The Euclidean distance may beweighted or unweighted.

Host 130 maps the distance (e.g., the Euclidean distance) between thequery feature vector and the search feature vectors into psychologicalspace using the mapping function (e.g., similarity matrix M) (608). Inthis configuration, the Euclidean distance is mapped from the objectivespace into the psychological space, rather than mapping the individualfeature vectors from the objective space to the psychological space.

Host 130 selects N search feature vectors having a mapped distanceclosest to the query feature vector (610). N is the number of faces thatare determined to be similar to the query face due to the proximity ofthe mapped distance between the search face to the query face. The valueof N may be a pre-set value, or may be dynamically determined during thesearch.

Lastly, the host 130 designates the images that contain the facescorresponding to the N selected search feature vectors as the searchresult images (612). In doing so, the host 130 may rank the N facesbased on the distances of their corresponding mapped search featurevectors to the mapped query search feature vector.

FIG. 7 is a flow chart of a process 700 for removing certain searchfeature vectors from consideration during the search, as implemented,for example, by process 208 a or 208 b. Process 700 also may beperformed by host 130 of FIG. 1, and may be used to determine the set ofsearch feature vectors that are accessed, for example, in operation 506of process 208 a or in operation 604 of process 208 b.

In general, process 700 may be used to eliminate those faces that willnot be of interest to the user. For example, an online dating servicegenerally may ask a user to input text-based information that describesobjective characteristics about the person they are seeking, e.g.,gender, age, geographic location, and profession. In such a situation,if the faces being searched do not also match the other criteria, it maybe more efficient to eliminate them from the set of faces searched.Similarly, some characteristics may be dispositive as to whether oneface is similar to another. For example, a female face may be designatedas not being similar to male faces. Examples of other characteristicsthat may be used include skin tone, and hair color or type (e.g., curly,straight).

In this case, the host 130 detects a class for the query face (702). Theclass includes the particular features or attributes that may eliminatecertain faces from searching or may cause a dispositive result forwhether a face of the particular class is, or is not, similar to thequery face. For example, a user may seek females who look like theactress Nicole Kidman. Thus, the query face class is female.

Host 130 accesses a collection of feature vectors associated with acollection of faces (704). The feature vectors accessed may be asuper-set of faces that are potentially similar to the query face. Inthe present example, faces of all classes may be accessed.

Host 130 determines faces in the collection that belong to the class forthe query face (706). In the present example, faces that belong to thefemale class may be determined.

Host 130 forms a set of search feature vectors by selecting featurevectors that are associated with faces of the same class as the quayface (708). More particularly, only feature vectors associated withfaces of the same class as the query face (here, the female class) areincluded as search feature vectors and thus may be considered aspotentially similar to the query face. In this configuration, searchresult images may be of better quality (e.g., more likely to be similarbased on human perception of facial similarity) or the search forsimilar faces may be more efficient because faces having a class that isdifferent from the class for the query face may automatically be removedfrom consideration.

FIG. 8 is a flow chart that represents a particular implementation ofoperation 212 of FIG. 2 for updating the search results based on userfeedback. Process 212 also may be performed by host 130 of FIG. 1.

Host 130 may provide a user with search result images and a userinterface configured to receive feedback from the user regarding thesimilarity of the faces in the search result images to the query face(802). The user is the same user who provided the query image andrequested the search for images containing similar faces. The searchresult images may be those images designated as having faces thatcorrespond to the N search feature vectors as described above withrespect to FIGS. 5 and 6. The user interface (UI) provided to the userfor receiving the user feedback may be any of UIs 1000, 1100 or 1200, ofFIGS. 10-12, respectively, described in detail below. In general, onceuser feedback is received, the search results may be updated based onthe feedback.

Host 130 may receive user feedback via the user interface (804). Theuser feedback may be an indication of which search result images havefaces that are similar to the query face and which do not. This type offeedback may be received explicitly or implicitly. For example, the usermay explicitly indicate that a particular search result image does notinclude a face that the user finds similar to the query face. Thefeature vector associated with this poor search result image may bedesignated as a negative feature vector. In contrast, when the userexplicitly indicates that a particular search result image does includea face that the user finds similar to the query face, the feature vectorassociated with that search result image may be designated a positivefeature vector.

Implicit feedback also may be received by host 130 based on the user'sactions with respect to the search result image. For example, if a userrequests faces that are similar to the celebrity Nicole Kidman whileusing an online dating application and the user selects a particularsearch result image to, for example, view the face in a larger size orread accompanying profile information, this action by the user may implythat the user finds the particular search result image to be similar tothe query face of Nicole Kidman. Thus, host 130 may designate thefeature vector associated with the particular search result image as apositive feature vector. The opposite also may be true if a user doesnot select a particular search result image.

In another example, rather than indicating that a particular searchresult image does or does not include a face that the user finds similarto the query face, the user also may request a new search with a newquery face (which may imply that none of the search result imagesinclude a similar face). In yet another example, the user may indicatespecific facial features of the faces in the search result images thatare, or are not, similar enough to the query face in order to receivemore responsive search results via a new search.

Based on the particular user's perception of facial similarity, which isdetermined by the user feedback, boat 130 may update the search resultsusing this feedback (806). To that and, host 130 may use the positiveand/or negative vectors to determine which features are good or baddiscriminators of similarity, and re-run process 208 a or process 208 busing appropriately weighted versions of those features or the distancesbetween those features.

For example, if a certain feature, such as, for example, the distancebetween the eyes, is found to be particularly helpful in determiningsimilarity between two faces based on human perception of facialsimilarity, the distance between the corresponding feature in the queryand search features may be weighted more than other features whenre-running process 208 a or process 208 b. The weighting may be appliedin the objective feature space or the psychological feature space,depending on whether the distance or vectors are mapped. Weighting aparticular feature may cause two faces having similar values for theparticular feature to be deemed similar even if no other, or very fewother, features have values that are close. Weighting the particularfeature also may cause a first face to be deemed similar to a secondface when the first and second faces have close values for just theparticular feature, while the first face may be deemed not similar to athird face even though the number of features that are similar (e.g.,have close feature values) among the first and third faces may be more,but the features that are similar are not as important (e.g., notweighted highly) as the particular feature.

To determine feature weights, the host 130, may, for example calculate astandard deviation for each feature value i (σ_(i), where i=1, i+1, . .. n) across the set of positive feature vectors. The weights for eachfeature value i (w_(i)) may then be assigned the inverse of the standarddeviation, such that w_(i)=1/σ_(i). Doing so adds a higher weight tothose features that are more closely clustered around a particularvalue, which indicates the feature may be a good discriminator ofsimilarity.

Upon determining the weights, the distance D between a feature value ina search feature vector and the corresponding feature value within thequery feature vector may be multiplied by its associated weight whenre-running process 208 a or process 208 b. Thus,

$D = \sqrt{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}\; {w_{i}\left( {A_{i} - B_{i}} \right)}^{2}}$

where A_(i), i=1, i+1, . . . n, corresponds to the feature components ofthe search feature vector and B_(i), i=1, i+1, . . . n, corresponds tothe feature components of the query feature vector.

Similar techniques may be applied to the negative feature vectors, orthe combination of positive and negative feature vectors, to obtain theweights wt. Also, to the extent that weights are determined prior todetermining the initial search results, such weights may be used in theinitial run of process 208 a or process 208 b to obtain the initialsearch results.

In some implementations, user feedback may be used to update thesimilarity information such that future searches requested by theparticular user may yield more responsive search result images. Forexample, the collection of positive and negative feature vectors may beused by host 130 to actually update the information related to distancesor inequalities between images. For example, host 130 may re-setinequalities for images associated with feature vectors in thecollection of positive feature vectors to reflect that those images aremore similar (i.e., conceptually closer) than images associated withfeature vectors in the collection of negative feature vectors.

In some implementations, the similarity matrix M may be updated directlybased on the collections of positive and negative feature vectors. Forexample, host 130 may include additional inequalities (and correspondingfeature vectors) based on the user feedback that would affect the valuesused in the summation to optimize M. In particular, although the searchimages and training images are different, the similarity inequalitiesand feature vectors related to faces that make up the collections ofpositive and negative feature vectors may be incorporated into thesummation to optimize M. The collections of positive and negativefeature vectors can be thought of as a new connected set for which alimited number of additional inequalities may be established. Theadditional inequalities may then be incorporated into the function for Mand M then may be recomputed.

FIG. 9 is an example of a UI 900 configured to allow a user to provide aquery face to initiate a search for faces that are similar to the queryface in an online dating service application. UI 900 includes inputfields 910 for providing general information regarding the type ofperson that the user is seeking. UI 900 also includes input fields920-945 for a user to provide a query face, which may be displayed indisplay window 950, and initiate a search for images that contain facesthat are similar to the provided query face.

More particularly, UI 900 includes input fields 910 where a user mayindicate, for example, the user's gender (e.g., woman) and the gender(e.g., men) and ago (25 to 45) of the type of person that the user isseeking. Input fields 910 also include an indication of the user'slocation by zip code or city (e.g., 20006) and any optional attributesthe user wishes to find (e.g., someone who enjoys wine).

To provide a query face and initiate a search for images that have facesthat are similar to the query face, a user may supply the informationrequested in input fields 920-945. For example, a user may select aphotograph of a celebrity by clicking on drop down menu 925. In thisexample, the user has selected a photograph of Brad Pitt as indicated infield 920. Alternatively, a user may select a photograph of a particularmember of the online dating service by clicking on drop down menu 935.In this example, the user has selected the photograph of a member havingan alias of DateMe123 as indicated in field 930. Alternatively, a usermay select a personal photograph as the query image by either typing inthe location of the photograph into field 940 or browsing the user'sfiles (either on the user's hard drive, on a virtual hard drive or in anonline photograph album) by selecting button 945. In this example, theuser has selected a photograph located on the user's C: drive in the MyDoes folder and entitled Cutie.jpg as indicated in field 940.

Once a photograph has been selected, the user may view the image indisplay window 950. If the photograph is not the one the user wishes touse as a query image including a query face, the user may select anotherphotograph in the manner described above. The user then may search forfaces that are similar to the query face included in the provided imageby selecting Search Now button 960.

FIG. 10 is an example of a UI 1000 showing search result images andbeing configured for a user to initiate an additional search for similarfaces by providing an additional query face.

UI 1000 includes search result images (and profile information) 1010. UI1000 also includes input fields 1020-1045 and Search Now button 1060which are similar to input fields 920-945 and Search Now button 960 ofFIG. 9. A user may be dissatisfied with the search result imagesprovided in response to the user's search for faces that are similar tothe query face in, for example, a photograph provided by the user. Inthis case, the user may provide an additional query image and initiatean additional search. The second query image may be another photographof the same person or a photograph of a different person also havingtraits that are similar to those of the type of person that the user isseeking.

FIGS. 11 and 12 are examples of UIs 1100 and 1200 configured to providealternative means for allowing a user to provide user feedback about thesearch result images.

UI 1100 includes search result images 1110 and 1120. UI 1100 alsoincludes radio buttons 1112 and 1114 associated with search result image1110 and radio buttons 1122 and 1124 associated with search result image1120. A user may use UI 1100 to indicate explicitly whether the userfinds the search result images to include a face that is similar to aquery face provided by the user in a query photograph. For example, theuser may indicate that search result image 1110 is similar to the queryimage by selecting radio button 1112, while further indicating thatsearch result image 1120 is not similar to the query image by selectingradio button 1124.

UI 1200 includes search result images 1210. UI 1200 also includescheckboxes 1221-1227 configured to allow a user to indicate facialfeatures of the faces in the search result images that are not similarto those of the query image. Alternatively, or additionally, UI 1200also may provide a list of facial features in the search result imagesthat the user may indicate are similar to the query image (not shown).For example, a user may select checkboxes 1221 and 1225 to indicate thatthe eyes and skin tone of the faces in the search result images are notsimilar enough to those features in the query image. The user then mayselect Search Again button 1260 to initiate another search to yieldsearch result images having eyes and skin tone that are more similar tothose of the face in the query image, which may be accomplished, forexample, by weighting features or distances between featuresappropriately in process 208 a or process 208 b.

The described systems, methods, and techniques may be implemented indigital electronic circuitry, computer hardware, firmware, software, orin combinations of these elements. Apparatus embodying these techniquesmay include appropriate input and output devices, a computer processor,and a computer program product tangibly embodied in a machine-readablestorage device for execution by a programmable processor. A processembodying these techniques may be performed by a programmable processorexecuting a program of instructions to perform desired functions byoperating on input data and generating appropriate output. Thetechniques may be implemented in one or more computer programs that areexecutable on a programmable system including at least one programmableprocessor coupled to receive data and instructions from, and to transmitdata and instructions to, a data storage system, at least one inputdevice, and at least one output device. Each computer program may beimplemented in a high-level procedural or object-oriented programminglanguage, or in assembly or machine language if desired; and in anycase, the language may be a compiled or interpreted language. Suitableprocessors include, by way of example, both general and special purposemicroprocessors. Generally, a processor will receive instructions anddata from a read-only memory and/or a random access memory.

Computer-useable mediums suitable for storing computer programinstructions and data include all forms of non-volatile memory,including by way of example semiconductor memory devices, such asErasable Programmable Read-Only Memory (EPROM), Electrically ErasableProgrammable Read-Only Memory (EEPROM), and flash memory devices;magnetic disks such as internal hard disks and removable disks;magneto-optical disks; and Compact Disc Read-Only Memory (CD-ROM). Anyof the foregoing may be supplemented by, or incorporated in,specially-designed ASICs (application-specific integrated circuits).

It will be understood that various modifications may be made. Forexample, useful results still could be achieved if steps of thedisclosed techniques were performed in a different order and/or ifcomponents in the disclosed systems were combined in a different mannerand/or replaced or supplemented by other components. Accordingly, otherimplementations are within the scope of the following claims.

1.-23. (canceled)
 24. A method for identifying images in an onlinedating service, the method comprising: determining, using at least oneprocessor, inequalities between a plurality of training faces associatedwith one or more images based on received indications of similaritybetween a plurality of image groupings; determining, using the at leastone processor, a mapping function between an objective feature space anda psychological feature space that indicates human perception of facialsimilarity based on the inequalities; receiving a query from a user ofan online dating website; identifying, using the at least one processor,one or more other users of the online dating service responsive to thequery based on the mapping function; and providing search results to theuser of the online dating website based on the identified one or moreimages associated with other users.
 25. The method of claim 24 wherein:receiving a query comprises receiving an image that includes a queryface for analysis from the user; and the one or more search resultimages comprise images associated with other users of the online datingservice who looks similar to the query face.
 26. The method of claim 24wherein the query comprises receiving a name associated with acelebrity.
 27. The method of claim 25, further comprising: receiving aselection made by the user of characteristics associated with a personin the image that includes a query face; and removing search resultimages from the determined one or more search result images based on thereceived selection.
 28. The method of claim 25, further comprising:detecting one or more classes associated with the query face;identifying characteristics of the query face based on at least thedetermined one or more classes; and reducing a field of searchassociated with the received query based on at least on the identifiedcharacteristics.
 29. The method of claim 24, further comprising:identifying a plurality of search image results from among the providedsearch image results that was accessed by the user; determining one ormore common characteristic of the plurality of accessed search imageresults; updating the search results based at least on the determinedone or more common characteristics; and providing the updated searchresults images to the user.
 30. The method of claim 25, furthercomprising: receiving an identifier associated with the query face; anddetermining one or more search result images based on the receivedidentifier.
 31. A system for determining facial similarity among imageswithin a social networking service, comprising: a memory device storinga plurality of instructions; and at least one processor that executesthe plurality of instructions to perform operations comprising:determining inequalities between a plurality of training facesassociated with one or more images based on received indications ofsimilarity between a plurality of image groupings; determining a mappingfunction between an objective feature space and a psychological featurespace that indicates human perception of facial similarity based on theinequalities; receiving a query from a user of an online dating website;identifying, using the at least one processor, one or more other usersof the online dating service responsive to the query based on themapping function; and providing search results to the user of the onlinedating website based on the identified one or more images associatedwith other users.
 32. The system of claim 31, wherein: receiving a querycomprises receiving an image that includes a query face for analysisfrom the user; and the one or more search result images comprise imagesassociated with other users of the online dating service who lookssimilar to the query face.
 33. The system of claim 31, wherein the querycomprises receiving a name associated with a celebrity.
 34. The systemof claim 32, wherein the at least one processor further executes theplurality of instructions to perform operations comprising: receiving aselection made by the user of characteristics associated with a personin the image that includes a query face; and removing search resultimages from the determined one or more search result images based on thereceived selection.
 35. The system of claim 32, wherein the at least oneprocessor further executes the plurality of instructions to performoperations comprising: detecting one or more classes associated with thequery face; identifying characteristics of the query face based on atleast the determined one or more classes; and reducing a field of searchassociated with the received query based on at least on the identifiedcharacteristics.
 36. The system of claim 31, wherein the at least oneprocessor further executes the plurality of instructions to performoperations comprising: identifying a plurality of search image resultsfrom among the provided search image results that was accessed by theuser; determining one or more common characteristic of the plurality ofaccessed search image results; updating the search results based atleast on the determined one or more common characteristics; andproviding the updated search results images to the user.
 37. The systemof claim 31, wherein the at least one processor further executes theplurality of instructions to perform operations comprising: receiving anidentifier associated with the query face; and determining one or moresearch result images based on the received identifier.
 38. Anon-transitory computer-useable medium storing a computer program, thecomputer program including a set of instructions that are executable byat least one processor to perform operations comprising: determininginequalities between a plurality of training faces associated with oneor more images based on received indications of similarity between aplurality of image groupings; determining a mapping function between anobjective feature space and a psychological feature space that indicateshuman perception of facial similarity based on the inequalities;receiving a query from a user of an online dating website; identifying,using the at least one processor, one or more other users of the onlinedating service responsive to the query based on the mapping function;and providing search results to the user of the online dating websitebased on the identified one or more images associated with other users.39. The medium of claim 38 wherein: receiving a query comprisesreceiving an image that includes a query face for analysis from theuser; and the one or more search result images comprise imagesassociated with other users of the online dating service who lookssimilar to the query face.
 40. The medium of claim 38 wherein the querycomprises receiving a name associated with a celebrity.
 41. The mediumof claim 39, wherein the set of instructions further cause the at leastone processor to perform operations comprising: receiving a selectionmade by the user of characteristics associated with a person in theimage that includes a query face; and removing search result images fromthe determined one or more search result images based on the receivedselection.
 42. The medium of claim 39, wherein the set of instructionsfurther cause the at least one processor to perform operationscomprising: detecting one or more classes associated with the queryface; identifying characteristics of the query face based on at leastthe determined one or more classes; and reducing a field of searchassociated with the received query based on at least on the identifiedcharacteristics.
 43. The medium of claim 38, wherein the set ofinstructions further cause the at least one processor to performoperations comprising: identifying a plurality of search image resultsfrom among the provided search image results that was accessed by theuser; determining one or more common characteristic of the plurality ofaccessed search image results; updating the search results based atleast on the determined one or more common characteristics; andproviding the updated search results images to the user.
 44. The mediumof claim 39, wherein the set of instructions further cause the at leastone processor to perform operations comprising: receiving an identifierassociated with the query face; and determining one or more searchresult images based on the received identifier.